nanog mailing list archives
Re: Statements against new.net?
From: Simon Higgs <simon () higgs net>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 12:08:12 -0800
Hank,We tell them to use the ORSC root as it is the most comprehensive one out there. Once the collisions from New.net have been ironed out, the non-colliding new TLDs will be put in the ORSC root if they are not already there.
FYI, there's an IETF draft on the guidelines for avoiding multiple-root collisions here:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-higgs-root-defs-00.txt Feedback welcome.
Do any ISPs or web hosting companies have publically available statements on their web sites stating that they will not support the new new.net domains and why they won't? I am getting more requests from users to change our DNS root servers to support this and wanted to see what others tell their users. Any IETF/ICANN statement available?Thanks, Hank
Best Regards, Simon -- DNS is not a sacred cow that cannot be replaced by something better.
Current thread:
- Re: Statements against new.net?, (continued)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Howard C. Berkowitz (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Simon Higgs (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 17)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Jeff Workman (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? mdevney (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Clayton Fiske (Mar 16)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Simon Higgs (Mar 16)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Jeff Workman (Mar 16)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Vadim Antonov (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Stephen Stuart (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Hank Nussbacher (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Stephen Stuart (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Scott Francis (Mar 15)