nanog mailing list archives
Re: Statements against new.net?
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:05:15 -0500
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 06:57:24AM -0800, mdevney () teamsphere com wrote:
I don't know what your job entails, but my job description includes the phrase "keeping the network and all associated servers and services functional." Which means, among other things, making sure DNS works. Were I to go with new.net, I would be remiss in my duties and should (though I probably wouldn't) be fired.
I buy that as a reason for you not to use them, and I buy that as a reason for me not to use them. I don't buy it as a reason to make what they're doing illegal, which is what a few in this discussion are advocating. That'd be like making IPX illegal, because it prevents those machines from properly interoperating with TCP/IP.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: Statements against new.net?, (continued)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Patrick Greenwell (Mar 15)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Miles Fidelman (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Miles Fidelman (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Howard C. Berkowitz (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Simon Higgs (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 17)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Jeff Workman (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? mdevney (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Clayton Fiske (Mar 16)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Simon Higgs (Mar 16)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Jeff Workman (Mar 16)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Vadim Antonov (Mar 14)