nanog mailing list archives
RE: Statements against new.net?
From: "Mike Batchelor" <mikebat () tmcs net>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:18:12 -0800
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001 11:29:23 PST, Patrick Greenwell said: I fail to see how RFC2826 is in any way "political". Upon careful re-reading it boils down to: If you use one root, everybody agrees what things look like. If you use multiple roots, what people will see depends on which root they ask. How is this political?
Because the one root referred to is the USG/ICANN root. It cannot avoid being political (anymore). --- Computers hate being anthropomorphized.
Current thread:
- Re: Statements against new.net?, (continued)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Scott Francis (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Edward S. Marshall (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Eric A. Hall (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Simon Lyall (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Randy Bush (Mar 13)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mathias Koerber (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Patrick Greenwell (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 13)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mike Batchelor (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Havard Eidnes (Mar 13)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mike Batchelor (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Havard Eidnes (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mike Batchelor (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 13)