nanog mailing list archives
RE: Statements against new.net?
From: "Mike Batchelor" <mikebat () tmcs net>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:12:59 -0800
Because the one root referred to is the USG/ICANN root. It cannot avoid being political (anymore).Then you must be reading something into the mentioned document that I don't. As far as I can see, nowhere is either USG or ICANN explicitly referred to in that document.
Oh come on, we're not idiots here, what other root could it possibly be referring to? You're being intentionally dense.
- HÃ¥vard
Current thread:
- Re: Statements against new.net?, (continued)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Edward S. Marshall (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Eric A. Hall (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Simon Lyall (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Randy Bush (Mar 13)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mathias Koerber (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Patrick Greenwell (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 13)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mike Batchelor (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Havard Eidnes (Mar 13)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mike Batchelor (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Havard Eidnes (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mike Batchelor (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Brett Frankenberger (Mar 13)