nanog mailing list archives
Re: Statements against new.net?
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:34:57 -0500
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 03:03:04PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
If however, half the servers were ROT13 and half weren't, and the two did not interoperate, things WOULD start failing.
And so, either the businesses in the market would work out a way to standardize, or we'd live with it, like we do with the information on AOL that only it's users can access. Remember, the current roots are not mandated by law; anybody is free to not use them.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Statements against new.net?, (continued)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Randy Bush (Mar 13)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mathias Koerber (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Patrick Greenwell (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 13)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mike Batchelor (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Havard Eidnes (Mar 13)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mike Batchelor (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Havard Eidnes (Mar 14)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mike Batchelor (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Patrick Greenwell (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Patrick Greenwell (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Hank Nussbacher (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Rafi Sadowsky (Mar 14)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Brett Frankenberger (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Vadim Antonov (Mar 13)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Scott Francis (Mar 13)
- Message not available
- Re: Statements against new.net? Geoff Huston (Mar 13)