nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?
From: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol () nacs net>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 23:33:07 -0400
On Wed, Sep 30, 1998 at 08:57:08PM -0500, Jeremy Porter wrote:
So what you are saying is that Barry has a perfectly functional method of dealing with the problem and all the rest of this is a complete and utter waste of our time. Mr Sobol's comments doubly so, as they add no new information.
Where do you see him saying that? I don't think either your solution or his will work. -- Anyone who spams me will be subject to torture by Jake, my killer attack hedgehog, and/or Lizzy and Junior, my man-eating iguanas.
Current thread:
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?, (continued)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? scott w (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Steven J. Sobol (Sep 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Jay R. Ashworth (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Steven J. Sobol (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Steven J. Sobol (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Jeremy Porter (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Steven J. Sobol (Sep 30)