nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?
From: Chris Josephes <cjoseph () mr net>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 15:33:02 -0500 (CDT)
On Wed, 30 Sep 1998, Barry Shein wrote:
1. Performing traceroutes and other analyses seems to indicate that this domain is NOT being used for communication with entities legitimately located (legally, not only geographically) within the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Tonga, as intended.
Both ".to" and ".cc" are unusual cases. At the June 98 Usenix Conf. John Quarterman showed a graph representing country population and registered hosts for the country's TLD. Both ".to" and ".cc" were skewed because of their outsourced registration practices. The TLD ".nu" is probably pretty high as well.
2. Clearly criminal and malicious activites are arising from sites to which Tonga has provided comfort and sanctuary.
I don't think a subdomain of ".to" would be considered "santuary". If anything the country is really messing up their own Internet future due to their lack of concern over what happens to their domain. (Note: I've never tried this with a TLD before, so I'm not sure how sendmail would interpret it).
In support of this assertion I want to show you an SMTP conversation with what claims to be the Consulate of the Government of Tonga in San Francisco (This San Francisco office is listed as an official Tongan contact point for visas etc by the US State Dept): world% telnet sfconsulate.gov.to 25 Trying 209.24.51.169... Connected to sfconsulate.gov.to. Escape character is '^]'. 220 colo.to SMTP ready, Who are you gonna pretend to be today? VRFY postmaster 500 Bloody Amateur! Proper forging of mail requires recognizable SMTP commands!
Interesting responses, but you can hardly blame an admin for turning off VRFY can you?? -- _______________ Chris Josephes __/ MRNet \ chrisj () mr net __/ http://www.mr.net/ \________________/
Current thread:
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?, (continued)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Alex "Mr. Worf" Yuriev (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Steven J. Sobol (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? J.D. Falk (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Dan Hollis (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? scott w (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Steven J. Sobol (Sep 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Jay R. Ashworth (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Steven J. Sobol (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Steven J. Sobol (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Jeremy Porter (Sep 30)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Steven J. Sobol (Sep 30)