nanog mailing list archives
Re: Digex transparent proxying
From: Rich Sena <ras () poppa clubrich tiac net>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 06:22:07 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 27 Jun 1998, Karl Denninger wrote:
As soon as that happens widely the cache is useless (or worse) and therefore people who use them have a reason to ignore the Expires headers.
Sure if "everything" on the site is tagged as dynamic or is pre-expired then what is the point of caching at all - but "everything" doesn't need to be for caching and hit-stats to coexist - just count your hits on one item, just leave those items that ABSOLUTELY must be dynamic be dynamic - and items that should be updated daily - should have the correct expires date set - so that IMS can work to their advantage. -- I am nothing if not net-Q! - ras () poppa clubrich tiac net
Current thread:
- Digex transparent proxying Jon Lewis (Jun 25)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Aaron D. Gifford (Jun 26)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Nathan Stratton (Jun 26)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Michael Shields (Jun 26)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying ken emery (Jun 26)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Rich Sena (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Paul Vixie (Jun 29)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Karl Denninger (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Rich Sena (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Karl Denninger (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Rich Sena (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Karl Denninger (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Rich Sena (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying andrew khoo (Jun 29)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Rich Sena (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Aaron D. Gifford (Jun 26)
- RE: Digex transparent proxying Derek Elder (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Paul Vixie (Jun 29)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Jeremy Porter (Jun 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Sean M. Doran (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Karl Denninger (Jun 27)