nanog mailing list archives

Re: Digex transparent proxying


From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 28 Jun 1998 08:07:50 -0700

Or detect a proxy and refuse service (which, if I was doing this, is exactly
what I would do).

"Go ahead, make my day."  If you can detect the proxy box I used to sell via
MII, and refuse service to it, I will post a retraction right here.

Not to mention those to derive advertising revenue from "views", and have no
way to measure them in a cached environment.  

"No way"?  How about:

rfc2227.txt -- Simple Hit-Metering and Usage-Limiting for HTTP.
        J. Mogul, P. Leach. October 1997. (Format: TXT=85127 bytes)
        (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) 

If I was doing that, I would also deny service to proxy servers and
display a nice message telling the user to remove the proxy or bitch about
its forced use.

Playboy.COM did something like that to @Home last year for a similar reason.
-- 
Paul Vixie
La Honda, CA                    "Many NANOG members have been around
<paul () vix com>                        longer than most." --Jim Fleming
pacbell!vixie!paul               (An H.323 GateKeeper for the IPv8 Network)


Current thread: