nanog mailing list archives
Re: Digex transparent proxying
From: Rich Sena <ras () poppa clubrich tiac net>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 05:45:46 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 26 Jun 1998, ken emery wrote:
Except when listening to the "proper" headers has been turned off by the cache (which some of these caching products support or will support).
In thoise instances though the implimenter of the cache is the fool - not the manufacturer - like anything the operator/implimentor of a caching product should have some understanding of WTF they are doing - sadly you are right - Ken - thre undoubtably are ppl out there that will say "Hey this will let me cache it longer - kewl beans!" - and will suffer the consequences of their decision - but that doesn't really mean that the product should not afford the operater the options of fine tuning their performance. -- I am nothing if not net-Q! - ras () poppa clubrich tiac net
Current thread:
- Digex transparent proxying Jon Lewis (Jun 25)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Aaron D. Gifford (Jun 26)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Nathan Stratton (Jun 26)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Michael Shields (Jun 26)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying ken emery (Jun 26)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Rich Sena (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Paul Vixie (Jun 29)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Karl Denninger (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Rich Sena (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Karl Denninger (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Rich Sena (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Karl Denninger (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Rich Sena (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying andrew khoo (Jun 29)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Rich Sena (Jun 27)
- Re: Digex transparent proxying Aaron D. Gifford (Jun 26)
- RE: Digex transparent proxying Derek Elder (Jun 27)