nanog mailing list archives

Re: Digex transparent proxying


From: ken emery <ken () cnet com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 21:28:30 -0700 (PDT)

On 27 Jun 1998, Michael Shields wrote:

In article <35935600.FF54EBFE () infowest com>,
"Aaron D. Gifford" <agifford () infowest com> wrote:
It might also be time for content providers of time-sensitive data on the web
to redirect requests coming from Digex' proxy harvest machines to a web page
that says something along the lines of "Digex has intercepted your web request
and directed it through their web caching system.  This impacts the
time-sensitive data at this site.  Hence you cannot access this site in this
manner.
 
Any content provider savvy enough to put that up could just as easily
put in the proper headers to tag their content as cacheable or
uncacheable or cacheable until time X, and that would be better for
*everyone* involved.

Except when listening to the "proper" headers has been turned off by the 
cache (which some of these caching products support or will support).

bye,
ken emery



Current thread: