nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBN Peering issues
From: Adam Rothschild <asr () millburn net>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 10:42:15 -0400 (EDT)
Also, let's not forget: Essentially, the pain that will be felt by GTE/BBN is disconnecting themselves from many popular and high-volume web sites, including geocities, hotmail, sony, tripod/lycos, cbs sportsline, etc. As for any comments made by GTE/BBN regarding uneven traffic flow, I would sure as hell hope that is the case. Surely an HTTP 'GET' request consumes less bandwidth than the content spewed back. Then again, GTE/BBN may be too caught up to realize this, as they could very well be laughing their asses off all the way to the bank.
Current thread:
- Re: BBN Peering issues, (continued)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Forrest W. Christian (Aug 15)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Shields (Aug 15)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Karl Denninger (Aug 15)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Mark Tripod (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Shields (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Todd 'Mr Vendor Relations' Nagengast (Aug 16)
- Message not available
- Re: BBN Peering issues Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Jon Zeeff (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: BBN Peering issues Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues alex (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues David Greenman (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues alex (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues - FCC Notice of Inquiry on subject Nick Lordi (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues - FCC Notice of Inquiry on subject Michael Dillon (Aug 12)