nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBN Peering issues
From: Bradley Dunn <bradley () dunn org>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 18:12:34 -0400 (EDT)
From http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/daily/980810h.html
The central problem is asymmetry of traffic between GTEI and the hosting companies, Curran said. Exodus pumps many times more bits to GTEI than are sent the other way. This "problem" is easily solved. Compare the list of smurf amp nets to a bgp dump and determine which nets are behind AS 1. Send ICMP echo packets to those nets. There are of course many other relatively trivial ways to lessen the differential between ingress and egress. Thus the "central problem" is really something different, but who didn't already know that? Bradley
Current thread:
- Re: BBN Peering issues, (continued)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Adam Rothschild (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues alex (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Jared Mauch (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Mike Schrimshaw (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues David Greenman (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues alex (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues - FCC Notice of Inquiry on subject Nick Lordi (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues - FCC Notice of Inquiry on subject Michael Dillon (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues alex (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Adam Rothschild (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Bradley Dunn (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Dillon (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues steve (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Adam Rothschild (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Henry Linneweh (Aug 13)