nanog mailing list archives

Re: BBN Peering issues


From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () scfn thpl lib fl us>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 18:13:30 -0400

On Sat, Aug 15, 1998 at 09:49:06PM +0000, Michael Shields wrote:
"Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc () iMach com> wrote:
After all, it's the BBN customers REQUESTING the data from exodus, not the
other way around.

This argument goes around and around every time.  Unless you have a
customer relationship with Exodus or BBN there is no point in arguing
about what should happen with this particular case, and there is no
point at all in arguing about what is the morally correct thing for
the general case.  The only way to determine the value of connecting
network A to network B, in either sign or magnitude, is for A and B to
negotiate a price, which may even be zero.  And that's what's
happening here, albeit in a unusually painful and visible way.

If you have an opinion and are a customer of BBN or Exodus, tell them
your opinion.  Otherwise there is no need to care.

I disagree.

Precedent, m'boy, precedent.  There _is_ a reasonable derivation from
the available facts, or at least a pattern to create one... _if_ people
who have to make the judgement call don't see fit to toss it in the
trash.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra () baylink com
Member of the Technical Staff             Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet      "Two words: Darth Doogie."  -- Jason Colby,
Tampa Bay, Florida             on alt.fan.heinlein             +1 813 790 7592

Managing Editor, Top Of The Key sports e-zine ------------ http://www.totk.com


Current thread: