nanog mailing list archives
RE: BBN Peering issues
From: Goldstein_William () bns att com
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1998 14:58:19 -0400
Thanks for the reality check. Whether the rest of us like it or not, you're right. Bill Goldstein Senior Internet Specialist AT&T wgoldstein () att com TEL:(412)642-7288 ---------- From: shields Sent: Sunday, August 16, 1998 3:59 AM To: mark Cc: shields; nanog Subject: Re: BBN Peering issues > fundamentally important that these ideals be extended to the future of > the Internet, if it is to have a future. No company should have the > right to force another to pay for connectivity simply because the latter > has not been around since the beginning or they are not a telco. BBN is answerable to their customers and shareholders and not to your or my ideals of how the Internet should work. -- Shields, CrossLink. <<File: Re_ BBN Peering issues.TXT>>
Current thread:
- Re: BBN Peering issues, (continued)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 15)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean M. Doran (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues steve (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean M. Doran (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Matt Sommer (Aug 14)
- FW: BBN Peering issues Lawrence A. Deleski (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Sean Donelan (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Hank Nussbacher (Aug 15)
- RE: BBN Peering issues Goldstein_William (Aug 16)
- RE: BBN Peering issues Goldstein_William (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Karl Denninger (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Henry Linneweh (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Shields (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Mark Tripod (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Shields (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Tracy J. Snell (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Owen DeLong (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Vadim Antonov (Aug 18)