nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBN Peering issues
From: "Lawrence A. Deleski" <lad () inficad com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 10:26:25 +0000
Sean, I'm not sure what the traceroutes prove, but there are at least 50 other reasonable, logical explanations that can cause the traffic to exit at different points. I was a Director at Exodus and I happen to know factually that it is the policy of Exodus engineering to not buy transit. The peering arrangement with Sprint is transit-free, and fee-free. It is a true PX. The disclaimer, of course, is that I don't work there anymore, but logically it wouldn't make too much sense to trade-in a fee-free PX with Sprint for a for-fee transit arrangement. This also assumes, of course, that Sprint didn't pull a "BBN" in complete secrecy and forced all of their private exchanges to buy transit. If they did, they should have told BBN how to keep the whole thing quiet. Is it more fun to presume that Exodus is buying transit and therefore easier to poke at in public? I'm not sure what constructive purpose this thread addresses. The larger issue is that BBN is trying to screw around with free exchange of traffic on the Internet, just like UUNet tried to do last year. This will only hurt BBN's customers, and subsequently BBN, as their customers bail in droves from their narrow-minded and self-serving moves. --- Lawrence A. Deleski lad () inficad com ----------
From: "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org> To: asr () millburn net, dorian () blackrose org, owen () DeLong SJ CA US, smd () clock org Subject: Re: BBN Peering issues Date: Fri, Aug 14, 1998, 4:38 PM
| Private Exchange. It is a private exchange between SPRINT and Exodus. I see. And is it your assertion that Exodus does not pay for this peering, and that, moreover, the payment does not include transit services? One of the reasons I wonder, of course, is that it is pretty apparent from traceroutes that Sprint is not routing towards Exodus uniformly (see below, note different exits).
Not apparent at all. Can you explain further?
Now why would Sprint do that on a settlement-free basis?
Because that's what peering is all about?
I'm also curious about the assertion that you have no transit at all. Not even from Worldcom, maybe? I'm sure a public reassertion that there Exodus has NO paid-for transit from ANYONE would be interesting to everyone.
See above.
Sean. ... 8 mlm1-core.hssi0-0.swip.net (130.244.194.145) 72.640 ms 79.000 ms 6.226 ms 17 scca-12-p1-0-0.core.exodus.net (209.185.9.29) 188.063 ms 183.958 ms 231.547 ms
Current thread:
- RE: BBN Peering issues, (continued)
- RE: BBN Peering issues Goldstein_William (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Karl Denninger (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Henry Linneweh (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Shields (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Mark Tripod (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Shields (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Tracy J. Snell (Aug 17)
- RE: BBN Peering issues Goldstein_William (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Vadim Antonov (Aug 18)
- re: BBN Peering issues Gordon Cook (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 18)
- RE: BBN Peering issues cheops POP (Aug 18)
- RE: BBN Peering issues cheops POP (Aug 19)