nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
From: Peter Galbavy <peter () wonderland org>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 10:07:17 +0000 (GMT)
How about a new RFC outlining a method of dynamically delivering a relay host native to whatever service provider you dial in to ?? That way, any e-mail can be traced to a supposedly responsible end-user by the victimized ISP ?? Naaaaa.
Na. Howabout making sure that *every* dial in user has a fixed IP address. This way you can match *in real time* or later, without logs who did what. OK this only fixes dial-up accounts, but that is a majot part of the problem - and permenantly connected sites already have fixed IP address space. To anticipate the next flame - it is feasible, we do it. Demon that is. Peter -- Peter Galbavy @ Home in Wonderland http://www.wonderland.org/ http://www.whirl-y-gig.org.uk/ http://www.demon.net Be remembered not for your final destination, but for your journey.
Current thread:
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful, (continued)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful NetSurfer (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods (Oct 31)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Justin W. Newton (Oct 30)
- RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Galbavy (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Galbavy (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful John A. Tamplin (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Mike Norris (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Turnando Fuad (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Justin W. Newton (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Alan Hannan (Oct 30)