nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
From: Peter Galbavy <peter () wonderland org>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 08:53:06 +0000 (GMT)
Sure...and when I apply to ARIN for more space and show I've assigned a /21 worth of space to static IP dialup users, I'm sure they won't laugh while stamping DENIED on my application :) How does Demon get away with that sort of waste?
I is *not* a waste. It is a very good use of IP address space. We have usage density of about 99% of our allocated blocks. Meanwhile the customers love it bcause they can do things that not having an IP address would stop. Their own domain name for a start - "snark.demon.co.uk" for my dial-up. Security based on IP address. We have many many busines users who use the fact that they know what IP address a dial-up user will have to authenticate access to their corporate networks. We made a business case, and it is the correct one. We very rarely have much more address space than required, and whether or not the customers know what an IP address is, they come to us (as the largest provider in the UK) because of the feature set and quality of the service. They want an infinite number of mailboxes, they like to be able to reconnect a dialup that drops half way through a telnet of ftp session and continue from where they left off, they like the "instant" intranet they get. Adn so on. I reiterate. It is not a waste. What is a waste is people like Interop having an entire class A, like PSInet having a class A, like MIT ... fill in the blanks. They just got their first, but I cannot see anyone rushing to return them. Please do not judge other people's products and services because you believe that it shouldn't work. Peter -- Peter Galbavy @ Home in Wonderland http://www.wonderland.org/ http://www.whirl-y-gig.org.uk/ http://www.demon.net Be remembered not for your final destination, but for your journey.
Current thread:
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful, (continued)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods (Oct 31)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Greg A. Woods (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Scott Hazen Mueller (Oct 29)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Justin W. Newton (Oct 30)
- RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful Paul Peterson (Oct 30)
- RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis (Oct 30)
- RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful Paul Peterson (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Galbavy (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jon Lewis (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Galbavy (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful John A. Tamplin (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Mike Norris (Oct 31)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Peter Galbavy (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Turnando Fuad (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Justin W. Newton (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Alan Hannan (Oct 30)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Steve Sobol (Oct 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 30)