nanog mailing list archives

Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful


From: "Justin W. Newton" <justin () priori net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 16:27:01 -0800

At 08:36 AM 10/30/97 -0800, Turnando Fuad wrote:

[snip]
compared to (my experience of) the problem. We get spam, so do our
customers,
but it's a couple of messages, each of ~500 bytes. Even on modems
connections
[snip]

Because you happen to not be getting very much is no reason to believe
that everyone is so lucky.  Anyone who has been around for any length of
time, posts or has posted to newsgroups, is the contact for any number
of domains/ASNs/netblocks, or even hosts any number of domains gets
bucketfuls.   

Often times, they work from old archives of Usenet as well. I've received
garbage forwarded from old addresses I haven't used since '92 or '93.

It is unrealistic to believe that one's expereince is sufficeintly
representative to be able to generalize and define the scope of the
whole problem.


I think another question to ask is how much are we willing to spend to
fight spam. Justin Newton(in the NANOG meeting) mentioned $400 million as
what *all* ISPs spent to deal spam. 

Actually, Vinny Bono came up with that number, not me.  

**************************************************************
Justin W. Newton                        voice: +1-650-482-2840  
Senior Network Architect                  fax: +1-650-482-2844
PRIORI NETWORKS, INC.                    http://www.priori.net
Legislative and Policy Director, ISP/C   http://www.ispc.org
"The People You Know.  The People You Trust."
**************************************************************


Current thread: