nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
From: Cengiz Alaettinoglu <cengiz () ISI EDU>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 97 09:09:27 PDT
Danny McPherson on Wed, 08 Oct 1997 18:37:22 -0700 said:
And since I helped *create* the CA*net database *and* the CA*net route filters based on the various DBs, yes, I meant RADB.How many providers actually apply prefix-based filtering (based on IRR objects) to other providers? I like the idea of prefix-based filtering applied to customers (by everyone that claims to be tier 1 & 2 (&3), at the very least), as well as the idea of
configuring static filters for /19s and such, but if I were to build 46K++ lines of ACLs to filter prefixes from all eBGP peers for all registered prefixes (from several different registries) .. my routers wouldn't be manageable.
You may want to check out our configuration generation tool RtConfig in http://www.isi.edu/ra/RAToolSet. RtConfig does a good job of generating those 46K+ lines automatically from IRR. Cengiz
Current thread:
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU, (continued)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU David Carmean (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Alec H. Peterson (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU David R. Conrad (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU C. Harald Koch (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Kevin Oberman (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Selina F. Priestley (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU C. Harald Koch (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU John A. Tamplin (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Cengiz Alaettinoglu (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Phil Howard (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Steve Meuse (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU ken emery (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Jay Borkenhagen (Oct 09)