nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
From: ken emery <ken () cnet com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 09:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 9 Oct 1997, Steve Meuse wrote:
At 09:12 AM 10/9/97 -0500, Phil Howard wrote:Mark Milhollan writes...AT&T has been allocating customers from 12/8.And how many routes has it been split up into?According to nitrous, they are not announcing anything more specific than 12/8.
There are about 80 networks out of the 12/8 netblock allocated and advertised. Most of these are /19's, some are larger and a few are smaller (a couple of /20's). As someone from AT&T said earlier in this thread "they are being allocated to customers as if it were a nonportable block and the only way you will see the more specific routes is if the customers multihome" (or something to that effect). I haven't seen any of these subnetworks of 12/8 advertised by anyone other than AT&T. bye, ken emery
Current thread:
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU, (continued)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Kevin Oberman (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Selina F. Priestley (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU C. Harald Koch (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Neil J. McRae (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Danny McPherson (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU John A. Tamplin (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Cengiz Alaettinoglu (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Mark Milhollan (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Phil Howard (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Steve Meuse (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU ken emery (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Jay Borkenhagen (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Phil Howard (Oct 09)