nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
From: "David R. Conrad" <davidc () apnic net>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 12:47:55
(I think Dorian mentioned 63/8 and 64/8 as well).
61/8, not 64/8. APNIC will be starting to allocate out of 61/8 RSN, so if you want to modify your filters, note that APNIC will _not_ be allocating anything longer than a /18 (not even /19s). I believe RIPE has a similar policy on 62/8, but I'm sure they'll correct me if I'm wrong. Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU, (continued)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU blast (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Phil Howard (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Alec H. Peterson (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Miquel van Smoorenburg (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Mike Norris (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Michael Dillon (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Alec H. Peterson (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Sean M. Doran (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU David Carmean (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Alec H. Peterson (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU David R. Conrad (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Kevin Oberman (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Selina F. Priestley (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU C. Harald Koch (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU John A. Tamplin (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Cengiz Alaettinoglu (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Phil Howard (Oct 09)