nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
From: "Mike Norris" <mnorris () HEA IE>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 97 16:17:24 +0100
Not quite, part or all 62/8 is being assigned by RIPE NCC in Europe, and they don't give out smaller netblocks than /19's. We have 62.216/19 for example. The not smaller than /19 is common policy of RIPE btw.
RIPE are indeed assigning from all of 62.0.0.0/8 and, as per the policy and procedures document ripe-155, are doing so as Miquel says i.e. in blocks of /19 or more. On Monday, the RIPE NCC reported 50 allocations so far, with almost 75% of these appearing in the routing tables. It would be nice if we all got really classless and made this 100%. Mike Norris
Current thread:
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU, (continued)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Steve Meuse (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Dorian R. Kim (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Matt Ranney (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Michael Dillon (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Randy Bush (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU blast (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU blast (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Phil Howard (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Alec H. Peterson (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Steve Meuse (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Miquel van Smoorenburg (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Mike Norris (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Michael Dillon (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Sean M. Doran (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU David Carmean (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Alec H. Peterson (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU David R. Conrad (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Kevin Oberman (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Selina F. Priestley (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU C. Harald Koch (Oct 08)