nanog mailing list archives

Re: AGIS Signing up New Spammers


From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () scfn thpl lib fl us>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 17:42:43 -0500

On Mon, Nov 17, 1997 at 08:56:39AM -0600, Joe Shaw wrote:
[ ... ]                    A lot of us have gotten by on the premise that
we are not content providers, but service providers who can't control what
our customers see or do, and that there is illegal material out there that
we are not liable for.  I think that once we start making decisions
about what content we allow, then we are setting ourselves up to be liable
for what gets through.  Just think, responsibility for porn, warez,
hatespeech, harassment, etc.  Could this actually be used in a court of
law?  Although this is on the fringe of Network Operations as a whole, I
think it is a valid issue to be discussed on a Network Operators list
because blocking SPAM/UCE is an operational decision which might carry
some interesting legal dilemas with it.

No one will want to hear me point this out... but this is precisely the
point ol' Rotundo makes in his editorial this month... and Stratton
Oakmont suggests strongly that your perception may well be correct,
Joe.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                                                jra () baylink com
Member of the Technical Staff             Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued
The Suncoast Freenet      "Two words: Darth Doogie."  -- Jason Colby,
Tampa Bay, Florida             on alt.fan.heinlein              +1 813 790 7592


Current thread: