Re: The Big Squeeze

[Sean Donelan <SEAN () SDG DRA COM>]

> > I would suggest that the largest percentage of flapping prefixes in the
> > global routing system belong to prefixes longer than /19.
>
> Hence the convention to damp differently for different lengths.  See one of
> the foils in http://www.psg.com/~randy/970210.nanog/, which suggests that we
> over here start following the European lead on this.

Is the route computation of a /8 prefix flapping once a second any
different than a /24 flapping once a second?  If /8's are "naturally"
more stable, then why allow them to flap more before dampening them?

When dampening was first being rolled out I remember one of the early
networks that got hit was PSI's net 38/8.  Treating flapping prefixes
differently based on length has more to do with how many people scream
when prefixes covering a large amount of address space get dampened
than the impact of the route flap of an individual prefix on the router.

Although most folks have permanently filtered it, isn't 1/8 still the
flappiest prefix of all.
-- 
Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO
  Affiliation given for identification not representation
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -