nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Big Squeeze
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 1997 11:46:58 -0500
At 11:33 AM 3/2/97 -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Que sera, sera. Renumbering is a fact of life. See: RFC1900, RFC2008, RFC2071.Never said it wasn't a fact a life, just that it's a painful one... And a disruptive one. Imagine the heartburn if a group with simply one ClassB was required to totally renumber to another...
I never meant to imply that it wasn't disliked and painful. One also might suggest that address portability is very much dependent on the prefix size and it's ability to aggregated (or not) elsewhere in the global topology. Having said that, a /16 is generally considered portable. - paul - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: The Big Squeeze, (continued)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Paul Ferguson (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Paul Ferguson (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Paul Ferguson (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Paul Ferguson (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Jim Jagielski (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Michael Dillon (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Nathan Stratton (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Jim Jagielski (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Paul Ferguson (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Paul Ferguson (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Scott Huddle (Mar 02)
- RE: The Big Squeeze Jim Fleming (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Kim Hubbard (Mar 02)
- RE: The Big Squeeze Jim Fleming (Mar 02)
- RE: The Big Squeeze Jim Fleming (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Sean Donelan (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Alan Barrett (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Erik Sherk (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Randy Bush (Mar 02)
(Thread continues...)