nanog mailing list archives
RE: The Big Squeeze
From: Jim Fleming <JimFleming () unety net>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 23:41:58 -0600
On Sunday, March 02, 1997 11:28 PM, Paul Ferguson[SMTP:pferguso () cisco com] wrote: @ At 04:03 PM 3/2/97 -0600, Scott Huddle wrote: @ @ > @ >I'll assert that if the costs of accepting a route announcement are @ >non-zero that this can only happen if there is a market for @ >announcements and a system of settlements between providers. @ > @ >If the costs are zero, then why have the filters? @ > @ @ I'd suggest that costs are non-zero, and they cannot be quantified @ by dollars, at least today. Since the majority of instability in @ the global Internet is originated by prefixes longer than /19's, @ the amount of resources consumed is an exercise left for the reader. @ Would you support charging $$$ for circuits that go in and out of service beyond some reasonable amount ? Car insurance companies charge people more that have more accidents...:-) -- Jim Fleming Unir Corporation e-mail: JimFleming () unety net JimFleming@unety.s0.g0 (EDNS/IPv8) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- RE: The Big Squeeze, (continued)
- RE: The Big Squeeze Jim Fleming (Mar 02)
- RE: The Big Squeeze Jim Fleming (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Sean Donelan (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Alan Barrett (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Erik Sherk (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Alec H. Peterson (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Avi Freedman (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Bradley Dunn (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Peter Galbavy (Mar 04)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Tony Barber (Mar 04)