nanog mailing list archives

Re: audio/video again


From: "Dick St.Peters" <stpeters () netheaven com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 23:45:37 -0400

Paul Ferguson writes:
How would you feel if Pointcast slowly backed off and increased the time
period between updates, but at the touch of a key or movement of the mouse
it would go back to the "knob" setting? Obviously a low volume data feed
like Pointcast may not be that big a load on the net but the heuristics
(which do involve human factors) could probably be applied to a lot of
other things like video feeds that will be bigger bandwidth consumers.

I think this sounds fine, but I don't think you need an RFC to dictate
it. This would be a competitive advantage for an application, methinks.

This comment got me wondering, and I don't like where I wound up ...

Would it be a competitive advantage?  As far as responsible users go,
it probably would.

That brings up irresponsible users - users who don't care about their
impact, and even worse hacker-type users who would deliberately bring
down the net if they could ... how long before someone figures out how
to make a server direct a Real Audio stream (or whatever) at someone
else?  The leverage for hackers could be enormous.

--
Dick St.Peters,       Gatekeeper, Pearly Gateway, Ballston Spa, NY
stpeters () NetHeaven com     Owner, NetHeaven 518-885-1295/800-910-6671
Internet for Albany/Saratoga, Glens Falls, North Creek, & Lake Placid
          First Internet service based in the 518 area code
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: