nanog mailing list archives
Re: audio/video again
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 1996 08:01:02 -0400
At 08:15 PM 8/5/96 -0700, Michael Dillon wrote:
How would you feel if Pointcast slowly backed off and increased the time period between updates, but at the touch of a key or movement of the mouse it would go back to the "knob" setting? Obviously a low volume data feed like Pointcast may not be that big a load on the net but the heuristics (which do involve human factors) could probably be applied to a lot of other things like video feeds that will be bigger bandwidth consumers.
I think this sounds fine, but I don't think you need an RFC to dictate it. This would be a competitive advantage for an application, methinks. - paul - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: audio/video again, (continued)
- Re: audio/video again Dick St.Peters (Aug 04)
- Re: audio/video again Per Gregers Bilse (Aug 05)
- Re: audio/video again Henk Smit (Aug 05)
- Re: audio/video again Michael Dillon (Aug 05)
- Re: audio/video again Dick St.Peters (Aug 06)
- Re: audio/video again Ehud Gavron (Aug 06)
- Re: audio/video again Dick St.Peters (Aug 06)
- Re: audio/video again Dick St.Peters (Aug 04)
- Re: audio/video again Geert Jan de Groot (Aug 06)
- Re: audio/video again Michael Dillon (Aug 05)
- Re: audio/video again Dick St.Peters (Aug 07)
- Re: audio/video again Larry J. Plato (Aug 07)
- Re: audio/video again Dalvenjah FoxFire (Aug 07)
- Re: audio/video again Curtis Villamizar (Aug 08)
- Re: audio/video again alan (Aug 07)
- Re: audio/video again Dick St.Peters (Aug 08)