nanog mailing list archives
RE: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some packet size data
From: Barry Raveendran Greene <barry () singnet com sg>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 1996 09:28:25 +0800
Caches are a big win too. If more clickers pointed HTTP proxy somewhere we'd be a lot better off. Persistent connections between cahces is the only thing that makes any sense at all.
And we're about to see just how far proxy/caches will scale. On Sept 15, everyone in Singapore will be routed through proxy/caches. That's about 60K customers though SingNet/STIX caches (see http://www.singnet.com.sg/cache). Barry - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Comparing an old flow snapshot with some packet size data Kent W. England (Aug 06)
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some packet size data Curtis Villamizar (Aug 07)
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some packet size data Daniel W. McRobb (Aug 07)
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some packet size data Deepak Jain (Aug 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some packet size data Curtis Villamizar (Aug 07)
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some packet size data Daniel W. McRobb (Aug 07)
- RE: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some packet size data Barry Raveendran Greene (Aug 07)
- Re: Comparing an old flow snapshot with some packet size data Curtis Villamizar (Aug 07)