nanog mailing list archives

Re: audio/video again


From: "Dick St.Peters" <stpeters () netheaven com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 1996 03:24:32 -0400

But it is much much easier to tell a developper that their product
violates RFC2001 than it is to try to convince them that they are wrong
based just on engineering grounds. The developper and their managers will
dispute engineering reasons much sooner than they will dispute an official
Internet standard from the IETF.

An RFC would also make it a lot easier to justify restraints on what
users can do.  RFC compliance could even be turned into a marketing
advantage, which would put pressure on other networks to comply as
well.

I much prefer pressuring developers than pressuring users, but I think
anyone who runs a "retail" network or is aware of mailbombing
software, spamming software, or cracking software knows that being
part policeman and part parent comes with the territory.  "Bad"
applications will be written no matter what the RFC says.

--
Dick St.Peters,       Gatekeeper, Pearly Gateway, Ballston Spa, NY
stpeters () NetHeaven com     Owner, NetHeaven 518-885-1295/800-910-6671
Internet for Albany/Saratoga, Glens Falls, North Creek, & Lake Placid
          First Internet service based in the 518 area code
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: