nanog mailing list archives
Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc
From: Juha Heinanen <Juha.Heinanen () funet fi>
Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 09:18:27 +0300
No, I think he means longer. IN-ADDR.ARPA can only be delegated on octet boundaries, so IN-ADDR for /16 and shorter prefixes will be delegated in /16 chunks. IN-ADDR for prefixes longer than /16 must still be maintained by the root, since they cannot be delegated. this is a very bad thing, since it forces an ip NETWORK provider also to deal with the DNS of its customers, not just to assign a pointer to their DNS. when is this problem solved? with ipv6? -- juha
Current thread:
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc, (continued)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc bmanning (May 16)
- Message not available
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Randy Bush (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Paul Holbrook (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Vince Fuller (May 16)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc bmanning (May 16)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Louis A. Mamakos (May 16)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Vadim Antonov (May 16)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc bmanning (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc David R Conrad (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Mark Kosters (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc bmanning (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Juha Heinanen (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Louis A. Mamakos (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Louis A. Mamakos (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc bmanning (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Paul Mockapetris (May 18)