nanog mailing list archives

Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc

From: randy () psg com (Randy Bush)
Date: Wed, 17 May 95 07:37 PDT

This sounds pretty onerous.  If you insist on requirements such as this,
you should be much clearer on what you require, and what form you require
it in.


Check out RIPE-124.

Current thread:

Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Vince Fuller (May 16)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Mark Kosters (May 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Draft internic ip allocation doc Mark Kosters (May 16)
  - Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc bmanning (May 16)
  - Message not available
    - Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Randy Bush (May 17)
    - Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Paul Holbrook (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Vince Fuller (May 16)
  - Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc bmanning (May 16)
  - Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Louis A. Mamakos (May 16)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Vadim Antonov (May 16)
  - Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc bmanning (May 17)
    - Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc David R Conrad (May 18)
    - Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Mark Kosters (May 17)
  - Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Juha Heinanen (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Vince Fuller (May 17)

(Thread continues...)