nanog mailing list archives
Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () sprint net>
Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 14:24:39 -0400
There is an easy solution -- do not allocate less than /16s. This would relieve InterNIC from caring about IN-ADDRs (and will do good things for routing, too).
Of course that violates the NIC charter as being the NIC of first and last resort.
--bill
Which do we care more -- preserving status quo or keeping the Internet above the water? Sounds like the IPv6 anthem: Oh, yeah, we gonna fix things Without changing anything... --vadim
Current thread:
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc, (continued)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc bmanning (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc David R Conrad (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Mark Kosters (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc bmanning (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Juha Heinanen (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Vince Fuller (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Louis A. Mamakos (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Chris Chaundy (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Louis A. Mamakos (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc bmanning (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Vince Fuller (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Vadim Antonov (May 18)
- Draft internic ip allocation doc Daniel Karrenberg (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc bmanning (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Paul Mockapetris (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Paul A Vixie (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Paul Mockapetris (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Sean Doran (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Paul Ferguson (May 20)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Geoff Huston (May 19)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc peter (May 19)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Jeremy Porter (May 19)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Peter Kline (May 19)