nanog mailing list archives
Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc
From: bmanning () ISI EDU
Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 06:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
No, I think he means longer. IN-ADDR.ARPA can only be delegated on octet boundaries, so IN-ADDR for /16 and shorter prefixes will be delegated in /16 chunks. IN-ADDR for prefixes longer than /16 must still be maintained by the root, since they cannot be delegated. this is a very bad thing, since it forces an ip NETWORK provider also to deal with the DNS of its customers, not just to assign a pointer to their DNS. when is this problem solved? with ipv6?
No, the problem is solved, just not widely deployed. There is no requirement to delegate on octet bounds anymore. -- --bill
Current thread:
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc, (continued)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Mark Kosters (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Juha Heinanen (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Vince Fuller (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Louis A. Mamakos (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Chris Chaundy (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Louis A. Mamakos (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc bmanning (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Vince Fuller (May 17)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Vadim Antonov (May 18)
- Draft internic ip allocation doc Daniel Karrenberg (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc bmanning (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Paul Mockapetris (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Paul A Vixie (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Paul Mockapetris (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Sean Doran (May 18)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Paul Ferguson (May 20)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Geoff Huston (May 19)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc peter (May 19)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Jeremy Porter (May 19)
- Re: Draft internic ip allocation doc Peter Kline (May 19)