Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning
From: Timothy Demulder <timothy.demulder () wanadoo be>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 01:58:10 +0100
Jonathan A. Zdziarski wrote:
Why put this on CD3 instead of CD1? There are far more 2.4 users than 2.2 users out there. Installing Debian using the standard practice (starting with CD1 and moving up) is kind of like installing windows 95 and upgrading as you go. But either way, why not go with 2.4.20?
There is a 2.4.18 kernel available on CD1 during the install,just enter bf24 and you'll have 2.4.18 and ext3; and that's with Debian 3.0 CD1.
2.4.20 simply wasn't available at the time. I suggest you look into how a debian testing makes it to stable. http://www.debian.org
By poorly designed I mean text-based, crappy looking, not very user-friendly for the average person we're trying to win over fromWindows.
There's always Knoppix if you can't install Debian
Any good Linux distro geared for desktop users has to be able to hold its own against the simplicity of a Windows setup, if we're ever going to gain market share. There are some very basic requirements that must be met: 1. A simple, graphical setup
Debian *is* graphical, just not X-graphical :p
2. Out-of-the-box support for a wide range of hardware
That's about the only thing I feel you've got a point here.
3. Post-installation tools for configuring printers, users, etcetera
dpkg-reconfigure?? it works for me, so it should for you too.
4. A graphical, easy-to-use patch system
apt-get update; apt-get upgrade , how hard is that? you want easy? -> install synaptic.
5. Simple, yet standardized enough to be used by savvy Linux users
Debian is simple, no more files in weird locations like RedHat, Mandy, SuSE and the likes, so it's more standardized than any of the rpm-based distro's.
> Debian meets maybe 1 or 2 of these. Like I said: if you can't install Debian, but want to use it: check Knoppix. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Joshua Levitsky (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Tim Groninga (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Karl DeBisschop (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Timothy J.Miller (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Chris Smith (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Nov 04)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Timothy J.Miller (Nov 04)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Timothy Demulder (Nov 04)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Peter Busser (Nov 06)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Tim Groninga (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning |reduced|minus|none| (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Michael Gale (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Richard Massa (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Paul Tinsley (Nov 03)
- Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Marc Chabot (.net) (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Michael Gale (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Joshua Levitsky (Nov 03)
- Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning Michael Gale (Nov 04)