Re: Administrivia: Poll

[Jason <security () brvenik com>]

Schmehl, Paul L wrote:
> IOW, make the list what it was intended to be; full *disclosure*, not
> full *discussion*.

awww, schuks, wtf...

I am in an odd mood. I feel like sticking my neck out there and have the 
spare domain and bits to do it so... to help with that and get 
full-disclosure back to disclosure I have created the list 
full-discussion () myhax0r com

If you want to go off on rants or discuss this 'off topic' stuff or want 
to see what the collecive thought is or whatever please take it there. I 
like the thought of having a place to vent bout this crap, kinda like 
the list bad-attitude a former employer of mine hosted internally, 
anyone know where that was?

No moderation, no complaints, if someone actually subs to it I guess I 
will have to create a charter that says it is free reign as long as it 
relates to security at some point or maybe simply a link to 
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=discussion

to subscribe 
http://www.myhax0r.com/mailman/listinfo/full-discussion_myhax0r.com

Flames to /dev/null please but if you want someone to get the mail point 
your flame to full-discussion () myhax0r com ;-)

-J

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html