Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: Administrivia: Poll
From: Steve <steve () videogroup com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:01:28 -0400
On Friday 13 June 2003 12:54 pm, Andreas Gietl wrote:
On Friday 13 June 2003 17:47, dev-null () no-id com wrote: sounds good to me. This way we could keep all the questions out and just let "full disclosure" in. But i wonder if this may raise to legal problems for the moderators. Maybe sometimes a vendor comes to the solution the disclosure of a security vuln lead to damage. He may not get the "poster", but he will get the moderators. Since the moderators MUST read all posts, they will be responsible for the information that goes on to the list and have to judge if the content is legal or not. So this would be kinnda hot ....
Legal?!? Since when does the accurecy or availability of listings on FD (or any other list) constitute anything more than "For Your Info, but you decide for yourself" postings? -- Steve Szmidt V.P. Information Technology Video Group Distributors, Inc. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: The point, kids., (continued)
- Re: The point, kids. Paul M. Hirsch (Jun 12)
- waste of time (was Re: Administrivia: Poll) Rick Updegrove (Jun 12)
- Re: waste of time (was Re: Administrivia: Poll) Chris Vicious (Jun 12)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll j. p. (Jun 12)
- RE: Administrivia: Poll Schmehl, Paul L (Jun 12)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll Riad S. Wahby (Jun 12)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll Jason (Jun 12)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll dev-null (Jun 13)
- Re: Re: Administrivia: Poll Andreas Gietl (Jun 13)
- Re: Re: Administrivia: Poll Shawn McMahon (Jun 16)
- Re: Re: Administrivia: Poll Steve (Jun 18)
- RE: Re: Administrivia: Poll Steve Wray (Jun 18)
- Re: Re: Administrivia: Poll Andreas Gietl (Jun 13)
- [OFFTOPIC] - moderated sublist announcement Kurt Seifried (Jun 13)
- Re: Administrivia: Poll martin f krafft (Jun 13)