Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Re: Administrivia: Poll


From: Steve <steve () videogroup com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:01:28 -0400

On Friday 13 June 2003 12:54 pm, Andreas Gietl wrote:
On Friday 13 June 2003 17:47, dev-null () no-id com wrote:

sounds good to me. This way we could keep all the questions out and
just let "full disclosure" in.

But i wonder if this may raise to legal problems for the moderators.
Maybe sometimes a vendor comes to the solution the disclosure of a
security vuln lead to damage. He may not get the "poster", but he
will get the moderators. Since the moderators MUST read all posts,
they will be responsible for the information that goes on to the list
and have to judge if the content is legal or not. So this would be
kinnda hot ....

Legal?!?

Since when does the accurecy or availability of listings on FD (or any 
other list) constitute anything more than "For Your Info, but you 
decide for yourself" postings?

-- 
 
Steve Szmidt
V.P. Information Technology
Video Group Distributors, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: