Re: Re: Administrivia: Poll

[Andreas Gietl <a.gietl () e-admin de>]

On Friday 13 June 2003 17:47, dev-null () no-id com wrote:

sounds good to me. This way we could keep all the questions out and just let 
"full disclosure" in.

But i wonder if this may raise to legal problems for the moderators. Maybe 
sometimes a vendor comes to the solution the disclosure of a security vuln 
lead to damage. He may not get the "poster", but he will get the moderators. 
Since the moderators MUST read all posts, they will be responsible for the 
information that goes on to the list and have to judge if the content is 
legal or not. So this would be kinnda hot ....

> I find it interesting that nobody has mentioned the obvious solution.  Keep
> this list unmoderated, and create a second list, full-disclosure-moderated,
> that consists of moderated posts to the original list.  All we need is a
> listserver and people willing to moderate.
>
> Dave Aitel of ImmunitySec started up just such a list after a similar spate
> of OT activity last summer, but it seems to have disappeared.  Anybody else
> willing to take up the reigns?
>
> --
> This message has been sent via an anonymous mail relay at www.no-id.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

-- 
e-admin internet gmbh
Andreas Gietl                                            tel +49 941 3810884
Ludwig-Thoma-Strasse 35                      fax +49 89 244329104
93051 Regensburg                                  mobil +49 171 6070008

PGP/GPG-Key unter http://www.e-admin.de/gpg.html




_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html