Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: HTTP in practice
From: Bennett Todd <bet () rahul net>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 05:23:14 -0700
On Mon, Sep 22, 1997 at 09:29:38PM -0400, Greg Haverkamp wrote:
[...] - Our product, eRoom, runs in a web browser on 95 or NT using pre-installed (i.e., not run-time downloaded) ActiveX controls, JavaScript, and HTML. - Some data passes as a custom application type, sent as Content-Type: application/x-eRoom, from both POSTs and GETs.
Interesting questions you raise. I started to launch off one answer, then came up with a completely different one. The most important thing is for you to identify a target market, and then ask this sort of question of _them_. I don't know how many of firewall-wizards lie in your target market, and that's the real question. Your target market is going to (a) be tolerant of Windows 95 and Windows NT --- won't regard their use as an automatica condemnation; (b) likewise tolerate at least the mention of Active-X and JavaScript, and (c) be interested in your sort of groupware. The opinions of that crowd are the only ones you need to worry about. Offhand, I'd guess that you won't be doing much with Wall St. firms, you may get some interest from tiny startups that haven't worried about internet security, and that the bulk of potential customers will be connecting to the internet through ISPs rather than work connections. But that's just my guess. -Bennett
Current thread:
- HTTP in practice Greg Haverkamp (Sep 22)
- Re: HTTP in practice Marcus J. Ranum (Sep 22)
- Re: HTTP in practice Greg Haverkamp (Sep 23)
- Re: HTTP in practice Marcus J. Ranum (Sep 23)
- Re: HTTP in practice Greg Haverkamp (Sep 24)
- Re: HTTP in practice Bennett Todd (Sep 24)
- Re: HTTP in practice Paul D. Robertson (Sep 29)
- Re: HTTP in practice Joe Klemmer (Sep 26)
- Re: HTTP in practice Greg Haverkamp (Sep 23)
- Re: HTTP in practice Marcus J. Ranum (Sep 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: HTTP in practice Anton J Aylward (Sep 24)