Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: HTTP in practice
From: Justin Mason <jmason () iona com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 12:03:04 +0100
Greg Haverkamp said:
Now, given what I've read, I would expect 1) to be blocked fairly regularly, possibly even on intranets. I would expect ActiveX controls to regularly be blocked; but would 2) be the method? Or should I expect blocking the be done via Content-Type? Or perhaps a combination of both? And, frankly, I don't know what to think of 3). Generally, I would expect a well-configured firewall or proxy to block 3) until it's told otherwise. Is this off-base?
A good approach may be to convince the bigwigs that what's needed to deal with the "firewall problem" is a firewall proxy product which can proxy your protocol successfully. This is the approach our company (IONA, for the CORBA IIOP protocol) have taken. Of course, the code for the proxy would need to be written appropriately; so since you're the firewall admin, go for a job in product development writing it! ... that's what I did anyway, ;) --j. Justin Mason They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright justin_mason () bigfoot com Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. jmason!at!iona!dot!com www.iona.com/~jmason -- Carl Sagan
Current thread:
- HTTP in practice Greg Haverkamp (Sep 22)
- Re: HTTP in practice Marcus J. Ranum (Sep 22)
- Re: HTTP in practice Greg Haverkamp (Sep 23)
- Re: HTTP in practice Marcus J. Ranum (Sep 23)
- Re: HTTP in practice Greg Haverkamp (Sep 24)
- Re: HTTP in practice Bennett Todd (Sep 24)
- Re: HTTP in practice Paul D. Robertson (Sep 29)
- Re: HTTP in practice Joe Klemmer (Sep 26)
- Re: HTTP in practice Greg Haverkamp (Sep 23)
- Re: HTTP in practice Marcus J. Ranum (Sep 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: HTTP in practice Anton J Aylward (Sep 24)