Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting
From: "Charles L. Bombard" <BombardC () CCV EDU>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:01:09 -0400
I too have been contacted by Vendors after posting. I have found them to be professional, and in the nature of quick notes offering conversations about what they have to offer. When ignored they have not attempted another contact. I have yet to have one call me based on a message posted. Yet is the probably the key word. -Charlie ========================================== Charles Bombard, GSEC LAN/Systems Administrator Community College of Vermont 119 Pearl Street Burlington, VT 05401 802.657.4234 bombardc () ccv edu PRIVACY & CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, confidential, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of an email received in error is prohibited. From: Tim M. Crawford [mailto:tcrawford () GSB STANFORD EDU] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 12:00 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] OT: vendor contacts after list posting David, I agree with you. I have had the same issue. Interestingly, it came up in two discussions just yesterday here at the Educause Security conference too. In one case, the discussion was around creating a separate (non-Educause) list to discuss issues without the fear of vendors engaging those in the discussion. One option would be to require .edu addresses in order to participate on these lists. But I don't know how viable that solution would be. Tim On 4/11/07 8:51 AM, "David Boyer" <David () BVU EDU> wrote: For what it's worth, not long after making this posting I was contacted by Bradford Networks about their NAC products. I'm not sure how everyone else feels, but it's a real turn off for me when vendors troll these constituent group discussions to generate sales leads. Maybe this is common practice and I'm just being naive. Any thoughts?
David Boyer wrote:
Anyone familiar with Ciscos Network Admission Control (formerly Cisco Clean Access, formerly Perfigo), Juniper Infranet, Symantec Network Access Control or similar software/appliances? Like many schools, we have a 1:1 ration of computers to students. We'd
like to avoid letting vulnerable or malware-infected systems onto our network while simultaneously addressing the infection or vulnerability. Almost all of our systems are running Windows XP or Windows 2000. I'd be interested in hearing about your experiences with these or similar solutions. Any open-source solutions that you know of?
______________________________________________________ Tim M. Crawford | Associate Director, IT Operations Stanford Graduate School of Business 650.724.2447 | tcrawford () stanford edu
Current thread:
- OT: vendor contacts after list posting David Boyer (Apr 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Tim M. Crawford (Apr 11)
- Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Mark Rogowski (Apr 11)
- Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Waller, Michael A. (HSC) (Apr 11)
- Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting John Kristoff (Apr 11)
- Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Charles L. Bombard (Apr 11)
- Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Cal Frye (Apr 11)
- Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Kevin Moulton (Apr 11)
- Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Paul Russell (Apr 11)
- Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Sarah Stevens (Apr 11)
- Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Marty Peterman (Apr 11)
- Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Waller, Michael A. (HSC) (Apr 11)
- Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Paul Russell (Apr 11)
- Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Conor McGrath (Apr 11)
- Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Mark Rogowski (Apr 11)
- Re: OT: vendor contacts after list posting Cal Frye (Apr 11)
(Thread continues...)