Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: More oshare testing.
From: alan () LXORGUK UKUU ORG UK (Alan Cox)
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 21:47:34 +0000
The ethernet adapter is on a completely different layer from IP, so I doubt the netcard has much to do with the attack. Also, I notice in the
Thats an unreasonable claim. It may seem intuitvely true but protocol stacks are conceptually layered at best. Different cards under NDIS will hand back packets in different ways, with several possible packet formats coming back where the frame is a linked list of pieces. Since BSD bugs have before now been mbuf pattern related I see no reason NDIS<->IP bugs should be different Alan
Current thread:
- No Security is Bad Security: John \ (Feb 02)
- More oshare testing. C.J. Oster (Feb 02)
- Re: More oshare testing. Jeff Roberson (Feb 03)
- Re: No Security is Bad Security: com-nospam () CCRAIG ORG (Feb 04)
- Re: More oshare testing. Alan Cox (Feb 04)
- Re: More oshare testing. Cristiano Lincoln Mattos (Feb 05)
- Re: More oshare testing. Dariusz Zmokly (Feb 04)
- Re: More oshare testing. Jeff Roberson (Feb 03)
- Re: No Security is Bad Security: Kevin Day (Feb 02)
- Re: No Security is Bad Security: Jan B. Koum (Feb 03)
- Re: No Security is Bad Security: Russell Fulton (Feb 04)
- Re: No Security is Bad Security: Jan B. Koum (Feb 03)
- Re: No Security is Bad Security: ecx (Feb 04)
- Update on w00w00 article (bug report) Shok (Feb 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: No Security is Bad Security: Donald Moore (Feb 04)
- Re: No Security is Bad Security: der Mouse (Feb 04)
- Re: No Security is Bad Security: Taral (Feb 04)
(Thread continues...)
- More oshare testing. C.J. Oster (Feb 02)