Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Anonymity via Tor?
From: krymson () gmail com
Date: 16 Apr 2007 20:51:01 -0000
Of course, I would never actually suggest anyone purposely route their highly sensitive web connections through another service or server when possible, especially Tor or a web proxy. Web proxies (and Tor) don't and really aren't meant to protect information (even though you can try to). Their purpose is just to be more anonymous from the point of view of the target web server. There would be zero need to be anonymous when working on your bank's web site, and you're correct, they should be using SSL anyway to protect the data.
Current thread:
- Re: Anonymity via Tor?, (continued)
- Re: Anonymity via Tor? Florian Rommel (Apr 15)
- Re: Anonymity via Tor? Scan_it (Apr 15)
- Re: Anonymity via Tor? Jeffrey F. Bloss (Apr 16)
- Re: Anonymity via Tor? phillip () cryptolife org (Apr 15)
- Re: Anonymity via Tor? Marcos Marado (Apr 16)
- Re: Anonymity via Tor? GNU/Buanzo - mod_auth_openpgp (Apr 18)
- Re: Anonymity via Tor? Vincenzo Ciaglia (Apr 15)
- Re: Anonymity via Tor? Krymson (Apr 16)
- Re: Anonymity via Tor? Jeffrey F. Bloss (Apr 16)
- RE: Anonymity via Tor? Petter Bruland (Apr 16)
- Re: Anonymity via Tor? krymson (Apr 16)
- RE: Anonymity via Tor? David Gillett (Apr 17)
- Re: Anonymity via Tor? Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Apr 17)
- Re: Anonymity via Tor? krymson (Apr 18)
- Re: Anonymity via Tor? kyle . bader (Apr 18)
- Re: Re: Anonymity via Tor? bardotherevolting (Apr 19)
- Re: Anonymity via Tor? Jeffrey F. Bloss (Apr 19)