Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Wireless Security
From: "Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr." <hfebelingjr () lycos com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:51:43 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -----Original Message----- From: Tim [mailto:pand0ra.usa () gmail com] Sent: Thursday, 13 October, 2005 16:40 To: hfebelingjr () lycos com Subject: Wireless Security I've got a question (actually a few) along these lines. Let's say that a person has a Wi-Fi network setup at home. And they find out that some of their neighbors have accessed it. A) What if any obligation to the neighbors does the person who initially setup the Wi-Fi network have? B) What happens IF one neighbor goes in and reads/deletes msgs/files from another neighbor's computer is the person who initially setup the Wi-Fi network for their own use liable? C) Can the person who initially setup the Wi-Fi network legally go in and look around his/her neighbors computers? D) What if one the neighbors get a virus, is the person who initially setup the Wi-Fi network liable? E) What if any expectations to privacy do the unauthorized users have? Responses: a) None. Unless you setup some sort of contract. FYI, wireless is not secure. ====> I'm talking about those who are illegally accessing another person's Wi-Fi network, not those who are/were/have been invited to use it. This is true, but it doesn't/isn't stopping people from deploying them. b) It is called electronic tresspassing or some such. It is illegal if they do not have permission. ====> True, but what if any liability/responsibility does the person who setup the Wi-Fi network have if it happens? c) No. Not without permission. ====> Not even to get the identity of those who are accessing the network illegally? d) Doubtful. It would have to be shown that there is intent to harm or damage. ====> I'd have to agree with ya there, and IF they're dumb enough NOT to be running some sort of anti-virus PRG that's hardly the fault of the person who setup the Wi-Fi network in the first place. e) Ideally, you should expect complete privacy. Realistically, none. Wireless 802.11x is not secure and encryption only keeps out the novices. ====> Again here we are talking about those who have illegally accessed a Wi-Fi network, not the person who set it up. Herman -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQ07Szh/i52nbE9vTEQLr3ACdGApdjHkzSOqP1/49egi7C/A2RIIAoNnM Lyk57ZBKYGHdSo/AC8Zk8Wt6 =QJsR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- RE: Wireless Security, (continued)
- RE: Wireless Security Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr. (Oct 14)
- Re: Wireless Security furtiworld2 (Oct 13)
- Re: Wireless Security pand0ra . usa (Oct 13)
- Re: Wireless Security Joe George (Oct 13)
- RE: Wireless Security Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr. (Oct 13)
- RE: Wireless Security Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr. (Oct 13)
- RE: Wireless Security Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr. (Oct 13)
- RE: Wireless Security David Gillett (Oct 14)
- RE: Wireless Security Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr. (Oct 14)
- RE: Wireless Security David Gillett (Oct 14)
- RE: Wireless Security Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr. (Oct 13)
- RE: Wireless Security Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr. (Oct 14)
- RE: Wireless Security Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr. (Oct 14)
- RE: Wireless Security Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr. (Oct 14)
- RE: Wireless Security Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr. (Oct 14)
- RE: Wireless Security Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr. (Oct 17)
- RE: Wireless Security Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr. (Oct 17)
- RE: Wireless Security Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr. (Oct 18)
- RE: RE: Wireless Security Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr. (Oct 18)
- Re: RE: Wireless Security Dave Bush (Oct 18)
- Re: RE: Wireless Security Alloishus BeauMains (Oct 21)
- Re: RE: Wireless Security Dave Bush (Oct 18)
- RE: Wireless Security Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr. (Oct 18)
(Thread continues...)