Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Undissected packet bytes
From: Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:41:35 +0100
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:
I believe g_log and friends go to standard out, but maybe not on all platforms. An expert info under conditional compilation would probably be enough though, I hadn't thought of that.
Another question. I've found a promising point to put the check (packet.c:call_dissector_with_data()). This function is called many times (I can count 4 times per packet). Sometimes when tree is open, sometimes when it's closed. How can I navigate (and check) the tree only and only if it's open? Only in this case I can check if there are undecoded bytes.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Undissected packet bytes, (continued)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Michal Labedzki (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Evan Huus (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Evan Huus (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Evan Huus (Feb 04)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Evan Huus (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Evan Huus (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Michal Labedzki (Feb 05)
- Re: Undissected packet bytes Dario Lombardo (Feb 06)