Re: Undissected packet bytes

[Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>]

I believe g_log and friends go to standard out, but maybe not on all
platforms. An expert info under conditional compilation would probably
be enough though, I hadn't thought of that.

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Dario Lombardo
<dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:
> > I suppose you could add a an expert info, but I think that might be
> > overkill, most users probably don't care that much.
>
>
> Expert infos could be added under conditional compilation. If enabled it
> would allow to filter packets that has expert info set, in order to find out
> incomplete dissectors against a large set of data (eg. menagerie).
>
> > You could just log
> > it, or dissect it as data, or...
>
>
> You mean using g_log, don't you? Where those logs go? I'm not able to show
> them.
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe