Re: Undissected packet bytes

[Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>]

I suppose you could add a an expert info, but I think that might be
overkill, most users probably don't care that much. You could just log
it, or dissect it as data, or...

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Dario Lombardo
<dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:
> > I think you will need to add a function very similar to
> > proto_find_field_from_offset that makes use of
> > proto_tree_traverse_pre_order and tracks which bytes have been "seen"
> > as the traversal proceeds.
>
>
> And how the output could be shown to the user? With expert infos?
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe