Re: How can Wireshark improve

[Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>]

On 4/25/14 10:02 AM, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> Yes.  I think in most cases you want to split packet relations up into
> two buckets :
> "packets are related because they form a request/reply (and or cancel) pair"
> and
> "packets are related for some other reason".
>
> We could fix this by changing all request/response fields to a new
> FT_REQUEST_REPONSE type.

This would let the Qt related packet delegate draw its indicators a bit
more intelligently.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe