Re: What does [WIP] really mean?

[Bálint Réczey <balint () balintreczey hu>]

2014-04-14 21:09 GMT+02:00 Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>:
> On Apr 14, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> wrote:
>
> > On 4/11/14 7:35 PM, mmann78 () netscape net wrote:
> >
> > > If a reviewer thinks the current patch is "a good start" for a feature
> > > (and worthy of current inclusion), is it okay to give the +2?
> >
> > I don't see why not, but he or she should probably check with the
> > submitter first.
>
> So +1 might be better - that way, the submitter can +2 the code if they deem it ready for prime time.
+1, giving +2 and a successful test round may trigger automatic
submitting in the future.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe